Subject: Re: [radext] draft-ietf-radext-nai: 2 weeks review period

From: Benoit Claise <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:20:02 +0000

FYI, I'll progress the document now.
Thanks to all.

Regards, Benoit
> On Jan 23, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Benoit Claise <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> This important document generated a lot of discussions during the IESG review, and those discussions led to some changes to the document.
>> This is one of those situations were the changes are numerous. Therefore I would like to give one last opportunity for the WG to validate the latest document version (basically checking we didn't screw up anything).
>> Please review the latest document version, or the diff compared to the draft version that left the WG: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-radext-nai-10&difftype=--html&submit=Go!&url2=draft-ietf-radext-nai-15
>    The changes were largely clarifications.  Additional text was added to explain the NAI and it’s use-cases.  There was a clearer separation made between the NAI format, and the NAI identifier.  The format is what the document standardizes.  The identifier is a specific instance of text using the NAI format.  The use of “we” was changed to a more neutral term.  The ABNF for the NAI was simplified.
>
>    Alan DeKok.
>
> _______________________________________________
> radext mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
>