Subject: [Raven] Re: raven digest, Vol 1 #92 - 6 msgs

From: Richard Higson <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 18:40:20 +0000

[email-masked] wrote:
> 
> Today's Topics:
>   5. Results of unofficial position tally (Thomas Junker)

>     "-" = against IETF facilitation of wiretap
>     "0" = neutral or no expression of a position
>     "+" = in favor of IETF facilitation of wiretap
>     "?" = ambiguous or took both positions
>     "*" = Press or IESG/IETF, counted but not included in calculations

> 0 Richard Higson <[email-masked]>

> Thanks to Thomas Junker for compiling the tally of positions taken for or
> against.  That's a lot of work to go through all those messages and
> analyze them.
SECONDED: Good Work [TM] - "The FACTS - and nuthin but the Facts"

> I imagine a lot of the people who wound up with a zero (neutral or no
> position) will be surprised, and many of them will probably clarify their
> feelings now that the tally is posted.
YES - change "higson" to read "AGAINST" as oposed to "no
opinion".

> In regard to the recent discussion of shutting down the mailing list, I'd
> vote for keeping it going to see if we can get a statement drafted that
> reflects, at least, the majority position in clear and unambiguous terms.
SECONDED :

My "first" posting was to show "where" chefren might be coming
from" as a 
board-designer (with-an-attitude ;-)

This posting is to clarify my position as being definately
against any IETF "facilitation" of wiretapping.

(back to lurking ;-)
//rhi
-- 
  Donate food by clicking: http://www.thehungersite.com
  2 seconds to save a life. It's your choice.
Have a nice day ;-) Richard Higson mailto:[email-masked]

_______________________________________________
raven mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/raven