Subject: Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis

From: "Gould, James" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 13:10:50 +0000

Scott,

No issues, add me under the support column.

--

JG

James Gould
Fellow Engineer
[email-masked]<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/[email-masked]>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>

From: regext <[email-masked]> on behalf of "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck=[email-masked]>
Date: Thursday, January 7, 2021 at 7:50 AM
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>, "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis

Feedback I’ve seen thus far:

Expressions of support: 8 (Jody, Gustavo, Tom, Maurizio, Mario, Roger, Jasdip, Scott)
Expressions of concern: 0

I noticed that James Gould expressed support for 7483bis, but not 7482bis. Jim, any issues?

Scott

From: regext <[email-masked]> On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 10:00 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] EXTENDED 2nd WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis

Caution: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear WG,

WGLC for this document officially ended last night.

Unfortunately we didn’t get enough support (+4) to declare overwhelming consensus for elevation.
The chairs have decided to give you all another week and extend this WGLC till Sunday 10 Januari 2021.

This document is suggested to be elevated from “proposed standard” to "Internet standard” as described by the process in RFC6410.
We therefor seek specific consensus from reviewers that they are aware of the elevation requirements, and that they have reviewed this document with the elevation intention in mind.

Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple “+1” is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this document as “Internet standard” by replying to this message on the list.

Regards,

Jim and Antoin

Op 4 jan. 2021, om 04:07 heeft Tom Harrison <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> het volgende geschreven:

On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:55:14PM +0100, Antoin Verschuren wrote:

This is a special second working group last call for:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis/<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1Poitm6YaScF92xTCZ6GbD9wm96gV8dOr4F88NgutuzbuBUUT5p53Axy6eqewrXJtP54lLKAG_MTODbzdIy4yLi4JqfnlFSHzsT53Gv6HpKN_kWNyMegdfmwf6a5CR4NCNU1-qG2n14zLyxfXJ9GSmJDVHEVFDKumNq6_HAbVJy4q7eRKociSwM6zISpodFf_YJUwyJP9f1rCTwqLVZcXRSfQTwcoGwIbQEOFqyW7su0j84TQ8Vx2BJKHQutmtYfsU5-8mU28B5_pYDCDnXNvkQ/https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-regext-rfc7482bis%2F>

This document is suggested to be elevated from “proposed standard”
to "Internet standard” as described by the process in RFC6410.
We therefor seek specific consensus from reviewers that they are
aware of the elevation requirements, and that they have reviewed
this document with the elevation intention in mind.

Please review this document and indicate your support (a simple “+1”
is sufficient) or concerns with the publication of this document as
“Internet standard” by replying to this message on the list.

This WG last call will end Sunday, 2 January 2021.

+1

-Tom

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1Oh_WbsfHzE2vSYWcN0ieA67M2IFx8DcJDJUel4FdBukZqSXEKvpoH629UKKoHvbg3n8uJ170JGNuclUNN620A2qvtTs9BilovM6TOWZSCofJ5JcjhSuVtsghXGqVaWq6PYDoEqLwZt6hLs_4OC2x9Y5fWt18g-j5V0x0NXCnThPZRvn3h9fBceSNFRSwLkEkfF2VQwIXcXQ1uzCjRueUDdlNm-drEZEjIN7sYFg0FPjKFAr1ZX_vSrrZfgKgNG2UWHGSfl88Ofg6Q1fwcLeRDg/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fregext>