Subject: Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-02.txt

From: "Gould, James" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:56:12 +0000

Scott,

Agreed, the title is better as “Use of Internationalized Email Addresses in the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)”.  The EPP RFCs have included “Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)” in the title, so it would be most consistent to include the long form.

--

JG

James Gould
Fellow Engineer
[email-masked]<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/[email-masked]>

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>

From: regext <[email-masked]> on behalf of "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck=[email-masked]>
Date: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 at 8:48 AM
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai-02.txt

Minor comment on the document title: “Use of Internationalized Email Addresses in EPP protocol” can be expanded to “Use of Internationalized Email Addresses in Extensible Provisioning Protocol protocol”. We don’t need “protocol” twice. Something like “Use of Internationalized Email Addresses in EPP” or “Use of Internationalized Email Addresses in the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)” would be better.

Scott