Subject: Re: [rohc] RE: External Encoding Methods (was: RE: ROHC-FN Snapsh ot - Wednes day's update)

From: Carsten Bormann <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:49:41 +0200

On Sep 30 2004, at 17:01 Uhr, Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB) wrote:

> What I have thought all the time was that:
>
> An encoding method is
> -- either defined in english (in the FN draft or in the
>    draft giving the FN spec)
> -- or defined in FN, i.e. by giving an FN structure that
>    defines the encoding method in terms of other encoding
>    methods, field lists, and let-expressions (in the FN
>    draft or in the draft giving the FN spec)

This is exactly my view.
(So far, the FN draft does not define any methods in FN, IIRC, but it 
certainly can.)

> I have not heard anyone saying that an FN spec can not
> define its own methods formally.

Actually, the *only* thing an FN spec can do is define encoding methods 
formally.

Gruesse, Carsten

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc