Subject: RE: [rohc] RE: Annotoations

From: "Ghyslain Pelletier (LU/EAB)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 14:34:06 +0200

> >> I suggested that the ROHC-FN draft removes anything about
> >> notation
> 
> Really? ;-)
> 

It's a freudian typo : )

I saw that only after having sent the mail,
and I thought no one would too evil to point
the flagrant mispelling of "annotations"...

Funny typo indeed ; )

/Ghyslain

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc