Subject: [rohc] lost (sigcomp) ACK

From: Cristian Constantin <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:10:11 +0000

hi!

nothing can be said about the remote end state config (and free state
memory) if an ACK for a state with priority p gets lost and the remote
end already has some priority p states, right?

in such a case, always switch back to the initial state, right?
(i.e. dictionary)

bye now!
cristian

_______________________________________________
Rohc mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rohc