Subject: Re: RSVP state machine

From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:16:30 -0700

*> From [email-masked] Wed Aug  4 10:59:34 1999
  *> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 08:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
  *> From: mohammad azmi <[email-masked]>
  *> Subject: RSVP state machine
  *> To: [email-masked]
  *> MIME-Version: 1.0
  *> Content-Type  *> :   *> text/plain  *> ;   *> charset=us-ascii  *> 
  *> Sender: [email-masked]
  *> Precedence: bulk
  *> Content-Length: 229
  *> X-Lines: 12
  *> 
  *> 
  *> Hi,
  *> 
  *> Does anyone know if the RSVP state machine is avalable or not?
  *> 
  *> Thank you 
  *> 
  *> M Azmi
  *> _____________________________________________________________
  *> Do You Yahoo!?
  *> Free instant messaging and more at http://messenger.yahoo.com
  *> 
  *> 
"The" RSVP state machine?

An FSM does not seem to me to be a very useful way to describe the
RSVP protocol, but I would be happy to be proven wrong.  If your
question implies that you intend to define a FSM for RSVP, we
will be interested in the results.

Bob Bradne