Subject: RE: [Diffserv] QoSSIG BOF

From: Istvan Cselenyi <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 02:02:33 +0100

Summing up the QoSSIG game (before leaving some of the mailing lists) there
are already two reasons to open a new forum

1. discuss new protocols as extension, replacement or successor of RSVP 
2. discuss adjusting the functionality and comlexity of RSVP

Any other arguments for/against a BOF?!

/Istvan 

PS

Yoram Bernet wrote:
> > "The ISSLL WG doesn't really suit to DS", I would point out that the
> > ISSLL WG has been working for some time on the mapping of 
> > RSVP/Integrated services to DS. So - this statement is somewhat 
> > inaccurate.

I meant the historical root of ISSLL and not the current IS/DS work. But do
you think that ISSLL is the right forum for all these?

_______________________________________________
diffserv mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv
Archive: http://www-nrg.ee.lbl.gov/diff-serv-arch/