Subject: Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] Security section - Invitation to comment

From: Erik Nordmark <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 09:51:58 -0700

Thanks Tom - looks better than the old one.

I don't know if you shared this with the rest of the DT.

I'll pull this into the draft, but I will add a sentence saying that the 
NVO3/VNI-ID discussion is more detailed because we know it better, 
however the same considerations presumably also apply at least to a SFC 
encaps.

    Erik

On 3/8/15 9:24 PM, Tom Herbert (via Google Docs) wrote:
> Tom Herbert <mailto:[email-masked]> has invited you to *comment 
> on* the following document:
> Document
> Security section 
> <https://docs.google.com/a/arista.com/document/d/1Qh0NgsmuGq2r_0mGekRMHLn-5KAxaycfMNtAMQ6QnIE/edit?usp=sharing_eid> 
>
> Erik, here is my attempt to resolve the TBDs in section 11.
> Open in Docs 
> <https://docs.google.com/a/arista.com/document/d/1Qh0NgsmuGq2r_0mGekRMHLn-5KAxaycfMNtAMQ6QnIE/edit?usp=sharing_eid>
>
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Google Docs: Create and edit documents online. 	Logo for Google Docs 
> <https://drive.google.com>
>