Subject: Re: [Rtg-dt-encap-considerations] NIC offload for encapsulation - Invitation to edit

From: Erik Nordmark <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 10:05:10 -0700

This is a bit long - I was hoping one could have references to some 
document with the background.

But for now I'm incline to add this as a separate section in the 
hardware friendly section.

However, I don't think it makes sense to include the remote checksum 
offload part; I know there is a draft on that proposal but the text in 
here doesn't seem complete. I could settle for "There is a proposal in 
doing a remote checksum offload for the case when the encapsulator is 
con-resident with the source host (XXX and the decapsulator is 
co-resident with the destination host?? I don't understand that side) in 
<xref target="I-D.draft-herbert-..."/>.
Does that make sense?

   Erik

On 3/7/15 8:42 AM, Tom Herbert (via Google Docs) wrote:
> Tom Herbert <mailto:[email-masked]> has invited you to *edit* the 
> following document:
> Document
> NIC offload for encapsulation 
> <https://docs.google.com/a/arista.com/document/d/1J-Atg73EfYZ9gjgZSMCAhsCZyzLKxo2LVV-1UgJoA8I/edit?usp=sharing_eid> 
>
> Open in Docs 
> <https://docs.google.com/a/arista.com/document/d/1J-Atg73EfYZ9gjgZSMCAhsCZyzLKxo2LVV-1UgJoA8I/edit?usp=sharing_eid>
>
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
> 	
>
> 	
> 	
>
> Google Docs: Create and edit documents online. 	Logo for Google Docs 
> <https://drive.google.com>
>