Subject: [Rtg-ooam-dt] Comments on OOAM Requirements

From: Gregory Mirsky <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:13:31 +0000

Hi Nagendra,
thank you for the great work you're doing with the OOAM Requirements document.
I've reviewed the version we have on the OneDrive and you'll find changes I propose in the attached copy.

                Regards,
                                Greg

---

From: "Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:57:12 +0000

Thanks. I will check this.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 16, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Gregory Mirsky <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:

Hi Nagendra,

                Regards,
                                Greg
<draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-ooam-requirement-00b+greg.doc>
_______________________________________________
Rtg-ooam-dt mailing list
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-ooam-dt

---

From: "Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:14:20 +0000

HI,

I have included the changes and uploaded back:

https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AiRsILA8bj-macQ&v=TextFileEditor&id=5D38B642A6E789F8%21132&cid=5D38B642A6E789F8&parId=5D38B642A6E789F8%21113

Thanks,
Nagendra

From: Rtg-ooam-dt <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> on behalf of Gregory Mirsky <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 4:13 PM
To: "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: [Rtg-ooam-dt] Comments on OOAM Requirements

Hi Nagendra,

                Regards,
                                Greg

---

From: Gregory Mirsky <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:26:01 +0000

Hi Nagendra,
thank you for you kind and careful consideration of the comments. I think we're ready to submit our draft. Couple minor nits:

*         Abstract s/L3/Layer 3/

*         Introduction

o   s/netwokring/networking/

o   p.3 second para s/requirement/requirements/

o   s/developing/developing/

o   p.3 third para I think we don't need to spell out OAM again as it already been introduced in the second para. 'OAM' shall do

o   s/existing Overlay OAM tools/existing OAM tools/

*         REQ.6 s/i.e/i.e./

Regards,
        Greg

From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 6:14 AM
To: Gregory Mirsky; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] Comments on OOAM Requirements

HI,

Thanks,
Nagendra

Hi Nagendra,

                Regards,
                                Greg

---

From: "Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:36:42 +0000

Thanks Greg. Fixed.

If there is no more comments, I will go ahead and submit it by EoB tomorrow.

Thanks,
Nagendra

From: Gregory Mirsky <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 12:26 PM
To: Nagendra Kumar Nainar <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: RE: [Rtg-ooam-dt] Comments on OOAM Requirements

Hi Nagendra,

·         Abstract s/L3/Layer 3/

·         Introduction

·         REQ.6 s/i.e/i.e./

Regards,
        Greg

From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 6:14 AM
To: Gregory Mirsky; [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] Comments on OOAM Requirements

HI,

Thanks,
Nagendra

Hi Nagendra,

                Regards,
                                Greg

---

From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:44:20 +0000

Thank you — Just one comment, Greg — I am not sure that all those references are really all Normative, are they?

Thanks,

— Carlos.

> On Mar 17, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Greg. Fixed.
> 
> From: Gregory Mirsky <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> To: Nagendra Kumar Nainar <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>, "[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> thank you for you kind and careful consideration of the comments. I think we’re ready to submit our draft. Couple minor nits:
> ·         Abstract s/L3/Layer 3/
> ·         Introduction
> o   p.3 third para I think we don’t need to spell out OAM again as it already been introduced in the second para. ‘OAM’ shall do
> From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) [mailto:[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>]
> To: Gregory Mirsky; [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>
> https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AiRsILA8bj-macQ&v=TextFileEditor&id=5D38B642A6E789F8%21132&cid=5D38B642A6E789F8&parId=5D38B642A6E789F8%21113 <https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21AiRsILA8bj-macQ&v=TextFileEditor&id=5D38B642A6E789F8%21132&cid=5D38B642A6E789F8&parId=5D38B642A6E789F8%21113>
> 
> Thanks,
> Nagendra
> 
> From: Rtg-ooam-dt <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>> on behalf of Gregory Mirsky <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> To: "[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> thank you for the great work you’re doing with the OOAM Requirements document.
> I’ve reviewed the version we have on the OneDrive and you’ll find changes I propose in the attached copy.
> 
>                 Regards,
>                                 Greg
> [email-masked]

---

From: Gregory Mirsky <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:04:53 +0000

Hi Carlos,
excellent point! In the Gap Analysis I put all references but RFC 2119 as Informative. I think that for Informational track that does make sense.

What others would recommend? Have you had discussions on how to list references in an Informational draft/RFC?

                Regards,
                                Greg

From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 9:44 AM
To: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
Cc: Gregory Mirsky; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [Rtg-ooam-dt] Comments on OOAM Requirements

Thanks,

— Carlos.

On Mar 17, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:

Thanks Greg. Fixed.

Thanks,
Nagendra

Hi Nagendra,

Regards,
        Greg

HI,

Thanks,
Nagendra

Hi Nagendra,

                Regards,
                                Greg