Subject: [Rtg-ooam-dt] PM Feedback

From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:17:54 +0000

Hi, team,

I received the following feedback offline regarding our presentation in Rtgwg:
Quick question about the draft-ooamdt-rtgwg-oam-gap-analysis-01.
For performance management the draft references to draft-tempia-ippm-p3m and RFC 6374, I was wondering why you did not include reference to Synonymous Flow Labels approach (draft-ietf-mpls-flow-ident-00,  draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl-00).
Is it because this work is too new?

I think we ought to meet to agree on the actionable feedback from Buenos Aires, and some key next steps as a DT>

Thanks!

 — Carlos.