Subject: [sacm] Fwd: RE: Poll on Scope

From: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:29:32 -0600 (CST)

----------Original Message----------

From: "Moriarty, Kathleen"
Date: Nov 21, 2012 11:27:06 AM
Subject: RE: [sacm] Poll on Scope
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>

Hi Dave,

Thanks for responding, would you mind posting to SACM? Your vote will be counted in either case, but it demonstrates clear consensus to see it on the list.

Thanks & happy Thanksgiving!
Kathleen
________________________________________
From: [email-masked] [[email-masked]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:19 AM
To: Moriarty, Kathleen
Subject: Re: [sacm] Poll on Scope

+1

On 11/21/12, Moriarty, Kathleen<[email-masked]> wrote:

Hello All,

Question: Do you agree that narrowing the scope to UC1, while leaving the design open to accommodate other use cases is the right approach for SACM?

This poll will close in two weeks from today, December 5, 2012.
Reply with +1 if you agree or alternate options for considerations if you disagree.

Thank you!
Kathleen
_______________________________________________
sacm mailing list
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm