Subject: Re: [sacm] Confirm Consensus - SACM Information Model as WG I-D

From: "Jim Bieda (jbieda)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:14:37 +0000

This doc needs work, but no objections to making it a WG I-D.

Jim

From: <Romascanu>, "Dan (Dan)" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 4:34 AM
To: "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: [sacm] Confirm Consensus - SACM Information Model as WG I-D

There was consensus in the SACM WG interim meeting last week to create a SACM Information Model WG I-D based on https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-combined-sacm-information-model/.

This message calls for the mail list confirmation of this decision. Please send your opinions and especially concerns (if any) with arguments to the WG mail list until Wednesday 9/24 COB.

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

---

From: "Landfield, Kent" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:23:12 +0000

+1

Kent Landfield
Intel Security
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
+1.817.637.8026

On Sep 18, 2014, at 7:15 PM, Jim Bieda (jbieda) <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:

Jim

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

_______________________________________________
sacm mailing list
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm