Subject: [sacm] meeting at IETF-91

From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:56:16 +0000

Hi,

It's time (already!) to submit a request for a meeting slot at IETF-91.

Should we ask for two sessions - as at IETF-90?

-          One session on Monday or Tuesday

-          The second session on Friday morning

The current list of conflicts includes:

dane i2rs lmap xrblock mile saag opsec eman netconf netmod tls ipsecme emu jose scim 6tisch dice ace

Are there other conflicts to avoid? Other special requests? Different proposals?

Thanks and Regards,

Dan