Subject: Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario

From: "Haynes, Dan" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:19:20 +0000

Just an update, I made this small change and a couple other minor changes based on Joe’s feedback.  You can find the latest draft at the following link.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario/

Thanks,

Danny

From: sacm [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Adam Montville
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:56 PM
To: <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario

There seems to be good consensus on putting our vulnerability draft through to the IESG.  Henk had some terminology-related comments that were augmented by Jarrett.  The suggestion [1] was to change "Endpoint Vulnerability Assessment Capability" to "Endpoint Vulnerability Assessment Capabilities" (make it plural).  Given that we have consensus as it stands, I don't feel that we should require the draft to be updated, but the change is small, and simple, so we could do so easily.  Danny, would you be willing to make that small change before we submit the draft to IESG?

Kind regards,

Adam

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/lPHC95Ug2lQWTYC1HG5s2iMOYic

On Jul 28, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Adam Montville <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:

This message starts a Working Group Last Call for the Internet-Draft ‘SACM Vulnerability Assessment Scenario’ — https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario/.  Please send your comments, questions, and edit proposals to the WG mail list until August 5, 2016.  If you believe the document is ready to be submitted to the IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC, please send a short message stating so.

Kind regards,

Adam