Subject: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology] Feedback on "guidance" (#54)

From: adammontville <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:46:51 +0000 (UTC)

Here, again, we seem to be applying a domain-specific definition to a generically understood term. I would prefer we didn't do that. Beyond that, I think the definition can be cleaned up a bit to something more like: `Input directing SACM processes and tasks.`

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/issues/54