Subject: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology] Should "expected endpoint state" be "expected attribute value" or "expected attribute state"? (#51)

From: adammontville <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 08:35:17 +0000 (UTC)

The state of a given endpoint is really the state of it's set of its attributes. So, it seems that either this term needs to change to fit the definition or the definition should be updated to fit the term.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/issues/51