Subject: Re: [salud] #4: Using <private-name>s as <alert-categories>

From: Laura Liess <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:16:41 +0100

I think this is a good idea.  I think it is no problem to change the
ABNF-syntax accordingly.

By the way, it seems to me that your mail didn't go to the salud ML,
also [email-masked] was in your CC.

Thank you
Laura

2013/1/28 salud issue tracker <[email-masked]>:
> #4: Using <private-name>s as <alert-categories>
>
>  Should private-names be usable as alert-categories as well as components
>  alert-indications (alternatives with an alert-category)?
>
>  Allowing this would allow private definitions of entire alert-categories.
>  Disallowing this would constrain private definitions to be further
>  refinement of standard categories.
>
> --
> -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
>  Reporter:               |      Owner:  draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-
>   [email-masked]      |  [email-masked]
>      Type:  defect       |     Status:  new
>  Priority:  major        |  Milestone:
> Component:  alert-info-  |    Version:
>   urns                   |   Keywords:
>  Severity:  -            |
> -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
>
> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/salud/trac/ticket/4>
> salud <http://tools.ietf.org/salud/>
>