Subject: [Sdn] ONF/IETF relationship [Was: I-D Action: draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-00.txt]

From: "Adrian Farrel" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 07:55:37 -0000

Hello,
 
[Changing the subject to protect the innocent]
 
The IAB is responsible for the appointment of liaison managers and the creation
of formal liaison relationships.
 
All incoming and outgoing liaison statements can be seen at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/
If you search for "ONF" you will find the IAB's liaison to the ONF on
"Relationship between ONF and the IETF " at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1171/
This was sent in response to the received message at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1166/
 
I read this as encouraging cross-body participation and cooperation. But a more
requests for a formal liaison relationship would need to be addressed to the
IAB.
 
Regards,
Adrian

From: Edward Crabbe [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: 20 March 2013 20:20
To: David Meyer
Cc: Rob Sherwood; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; JACQUENET
Christian OLNC/OLN; Dan Pitt; [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [Sdn] TR: I-D Action: draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-00.txt
 
+adrian
 
If we do have one, it's not on the liaison managers page ATM.  :P
 
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:19 PM, David Meyer <[email-masked]> wrote:
Copying Dan Pitt who can comment. --dmm

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Edward Crabbe <[email-masked]> wrote:
> Rob;
>
> The IETF has specific procedures for liaisons with other SDOs:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4052.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4053.txt
>
> I'm actually not sure that we have an appointed liaison at the moment.
> Perhaps someone on the list can comment?
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Rob Sherwood <[email-masked]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Apologies that I could not make the meeting in Orlando, but I was
>> originally scheduled to speak on how for the IETF to best interface
>> with the ONF on issues like this.  As you can imagine, coming up with
>> definitions and common vocabulary is top of mind for the ONF in
>> general and the architecture working group that I chair in specific
>> (if you're interested, check out our WG information at
>> https://www.opennetworking.org/working-groups/architecture-and-framework).
>>
>> If you're interested, to me it would definitely make sense to
>> coordinate your and our activities, because two sets of definitions
>> doesn't do any one any good :-)  Let me know how you might like to do
>> that - I believe Orange is a member of the ONF, so that might be the
>> easiest way to go about it.
>>
>> Please let me know and thanks for looking into this,
>>
>> - Rob
>> .
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:40 AM,  <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > We submitted this new I-D.
>> >
>> > Comments and inputs are welcome.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Med
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Message d'origine-----
>> > De : [email-masked]
>> > [mailto:[email-masked]] De la part de
>> > [email-masked]
>> > Envoyé : mercredi 20 mars 2013 16:36
>> > À : [email-masked]
>> > Objet : I-D Action: draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-00.txt
>> >
>> >
>> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> > directories.
>> >
>> >
>> >         Title           : Software-Defined Networking: A Service
>> > Provider's Perspective
>> >         Author(s)       : Mohamed Boucadair
>> >                           Christian Jacquenet
>> >         Filename        : draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-00.txt
>> >         Pages           : 13
>> >         Date            : 2013-03-20
>> >
>> > Abstract:
>> >    Software-Defined Networking (SDN) has been one of the major buzz
>> >    words of the networking industry for the past couple of years.  And
>> >    yet, no clear definition of what SDN actually covers has been broadly
>> >    admitted so far.  This document aims at contributing to the
>> >    clarification of the SDN landscape.
>> >
>> >    It is not meant to endlessly discuss what SDN truly means, but rather
>> >    to suggest a functional taxonomy of the techniques that can be used
>> >    under a SDN umbrella and to elaborate on the various pending issues
>> >    the combined activation of such techniques inevitably raises.  As
>> >    such, a definition of SDN is only mentioned for the sake of
>> >    clarification.
>> >
>> >
>> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach
>> >
>> > There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-00
>> >
>> >
>> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > I-D-Announce mailing list
>> > [email-masked]
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>> > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>> > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > sdn mailing list
>> > [email-masked]
>> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn
>> _______________________________________________
>> sdn mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sdn mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn
>