Subject: Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-07.txt

From: "George, Wes" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 17:56:51 -0500

From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:58 PM
To: Stephen Kent; George, Wes; sidr
Subject: Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-07.txt

I acknowledge that there are wider threats, that need to
be addressed, but as Steve says this I-D should not be
a hostage to us putting in place solutions to those problems.
[WEG] We can certainly discuss in more detail, but I did want to respond to this one thing...
I am not requesting that the doc be held hostage, certainly not until there are solutions. I am mainly requesting that the problems left unaddressed be discussed in a bit more detail to make the security posture clearer, without so many references to the specific choices made by SIDR's charter.
I can't seem to make it clear that I'm not trying to do an end-run around the charter nor editorialize on those choices post-facto. Rather I am merely stating that SIDR's charter does not make the problem disappear, and I'd rather see it discussed for what it is instead of handwaving it away because it's not in charter.

Wes

________________________________
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.