

(EDT)
[192.12.69.35])
	by optima.CS.Arizona.EDU (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3D0APl14022;
	Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:10:26 -0700 (MST)
Received: from P-micke (baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU [192.12.69.35])
	by baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id
f3D0Do308954;
	Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:13:50 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <[email-masked]>
X-Sender: [email-masked]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 02:16:25 +0200
To: [email-masked]
From: Mikael Degermark <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] Re: SCTP checksum problems
Cc: "sigtran" <[email-masked]>,
        [email-masked], [email-masked]
In-Reply-To: <[email-masked]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: [email-masked]
Errors-To: [email-masked]
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: [email-masked]

I've recently exchanged emails with Craig on a related issue, and he then
said
that if he were to modify UDP or TCP today, regarding the checksum, he would
probably go for a 32-bit Internet checksum. 

Cheers, 

Mikael Degermark