Subject: Re: [SUA issue 17 & M3UA issue #11] IPSP cases.

From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:05:49 -0500

Alf,

On Thu, 06 Sep 2001, Alf Heidermark (UAB) wrote:

> Depending on your implemntation you can do a change-over due to processor
> outage without changing host. It just say that the Signalling terminal lost
> contact up to the user. You can use it to change host if your implementation
> is like that but you dont have to.
> 
> I have actually not considered signsalling terminals to be host.

Host and processor is usually synonymous.

> 
> On the last point I mean that we can fulllfill MTP requirements without
> having multiple associations.

M3UA and SUA beg to differ.

> Istill insist to move this items to a new RFC, if people feel the need fotr
> this extra

What do you insist be moved to a new RFC?  IPSP cases?  Did you want to
see IPSP cases removed from the drafts?

--brian

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email-masked]
http://www.openss7.org/

---
You are currently subscribed to sigtran as: [email-masked]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email-masked]