Subject: Re: M2PA - Proving Complete

From: Tom George <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:31:48 -0500

Manish is correct. Figure 6 should have "Ready" instead of "Proving
Complete".

tomG.

[email-masked] wrote:
> 
> hi Howard,
>                        this is for the question you asked , in my openion
> proving complete is same as READY which TOM has mentioned in 2.2.2.
>                        i think there is no use to have two messages for same
> purpose.
>                        TOM  can you give further comment s on that.
> 
> regards
> Manish Sharma
> 
> Howard Lew <[email-masked]> on 09/01/2001 07:08:42 AM
> 
> Please respond to [email-masked]
> 
> To:   "sigtran" <[email-masked]>
> cc:    (bcc: Manish Sharma/HSS)
> 
> Subject:  M2PA - Proving Complete
> 
> Tom,
> 
> Figure 6 (M2PA Link State Transition Diagram) in
> draft-ietf-sigtran-m2pa-03.txt specifies a link status message of the
> type Proving Complete, but it is not listed in the table under 2.2.2
> Link Status.  Should it be there?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any info.
> Howard
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to sigtran as: [email-masked]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [email-masked]
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to sigtran as: [email-masked]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email-masked]

-- 
* Tom George        972-519-3168         [email-masked]   *
* PB2-1323       Intranet:  http://www.ssd.usa.alcatel.com/~tgeorge/  *
* Alcatel USA, Inc.; 1000 Coit Rd, MS PB2-STPA; Plano TX 75075-5813   *
* I actively disclaim speaking for Alcatel USA, Inc. I do not purport *
* to advertise or represent its position,  operations, or activities. *

---
You are currently subscribed to sigtran as: [email-masked]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email-masked]