Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: IPSP proposed text (1st approach)]]

From: Javier Pastor-Balbas <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 12:20:32 -0800 (PST)

Brian, 

IPSP1 won't return the same value for RK3 and RK4 in double-ended. It
will never happen...

IPSP1                       IPSP2

     REG REQ (RK2, RK1)
  -------------------------->

     REG RESP (RC1, RC2)
  <--------------------------

     REG REQ (RK3, RK4)
  <--------------------------
 
     REG RESP (RC3, RC4)
  -------------------------->

No violation here... 4AS:4RK:4RC

Examples of DATA msgs

       DATA (RC4)
  -------------------------->
       DATA (RC3)
  -------------------------->
       DATA (RC2)
  <--------------------------
       DATA (RC1)
  <--------------------------

Cheers  // Javier.

--- "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email-masked]> wrote:
> Javier,
> 
> > > > >   The routing table at IPSP1 is:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 	RC3 RK3
> > > > > 	RC3 RK4
> > > > > 
> > > > > Now, there is a problem.  This routing table at IPSP1 is
> > > > > not valid: there is the same RC value (index) for two RK
> > > > > entries.  How can this happen?  How will IPSP1 know to
> > > > > return the same RC value when RK1 and RK2 are registered?
> > > > > This would also violate the key relationship that there
> > > > > is a 1:1:1 relationship between RC, RK, and AS.
> 
> How can this happen?
> 
> --brian
> 
> -- 
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email-masked]
> http://www.openss7.org/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com

---
You are currently subscribed to sigtran as: [email-masked]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email-masked]