Subject: RE: [Sigtran] m3ua status

From: "Loughney John (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 14:37:31 +0200 (EET)

Brian,

If the draft is ready, let's ask the AD if it can be submitted as an AD sponsored RFC.

John

-- This email was sent from my Nokia E70 --

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Brian F. G. Bidulock
> Received: Sat Nov 12 13:48:42 EET 2005
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked], [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [Sigtran] m3ua status
> 
> John,
> 
> John Loughney wrote:                           (Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:34:59)
> > Brian,
> > 
> > It might be quicker if an individual draft was written, could be
> > reviewed in SIGTRAN and submitted as an AD sponsored draft.  
> > 
> > John 
> > 
> 
> Yes, that's what we were told previously and so we worked for a year
> on leading up to draft-bidas-sigtran-sgsg-03.txt.  It dates back to
> 2003.  You can get a copies of these (now outdated) drafts here:
> 
>   http://www.openss7.org/docs/draft-bidas-sigtran-sgsg-00.txt
>   http://www.openss7.org/docs/draft-bidas-sigtran-sgsg-01.txt
>   http://www.openss7.org/docs/draft-bidas-sigtran-sgsg-02.txt
>   http://www.openss7.org/docs/draft-bidas-sigtran-sgsg-03.txt
> 
> Tolga might have something even more current.
> 
> Also the archive is full of discussion on SG-SG.
> 
> This time I think it would be wise to make it a working group
> item _before_ working for a year on it, unlike the last round.
> 
> --brian
> 
> -- 
> Brian F. G. Bidulock
> [email-masked]
> http://www.openss7.org/
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran