Subject: Re: [Sigtran] [M3UA] IPSP receiving ASP ACTIVE Ack

From: Santhana <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 19:13:18 +0530

Hi Brian
	In the INACTIVE state when an IPSP/ASP receives ACTIVE Ack, your
suggestion is to send INACTIVE message to the peer(as per the below
discussion).

	In the similar fashion when an IPSP/ASP is in DOWN state, and it
receives UP Ack, Which would be the better response. "DOWN message" or
"ERROR(Unexpected)". As per the below discussion I understand sending DOWN
in this case is better. 

	Please share your opinion on this.

Regards
Santhanakrishnan

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 2:21 AM
To: Santhana
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] [M3UA] IPSP receiving ASP ACTIVE Ack

Santhana,

Yes, they are just ok.  Sending ERROR "Unexpected message" is certainly
not the best response.  ASP Inactive is a better response.

--brian

Santhana wrote:                                  (Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:37:17)
> 
> Hi Brian
> 	Then for unsolicited "ASP ACTIVE Ack" message are the following
> responses ok in SE mode.
> 
> =====================================
> PRESENT STATE	ACTION
> =====================================
> ACTIVE		No Action
> INACTIVE		Send ERROR "Unexpected"
> =====================================
> 
> Regards
> Santhanakrishnan

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
[email-masked]
http://www.openss7.org/