Subject: [Sip] Buggy example in RFC 3261

From: Peter Päppinghaus <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 16:24:26 +0100

Hi,

I believe to have stumbled on a buggy example in RFC 3261.

The 200 OK in the REGISTER example of RFC 3261, sec. 24.1 contains
an Expires header, but no expires parameter in the Contact header.

This violates RFC 3261, sec. 10.3, bullet 8:
"Each Contact value MUST feature an "expires" parameter
  indicating its expiration interval chosen by the registrar."

Regards,

Peter Paeppinghaus

-- 
Dr. Peter Päppinghaus
Siemens AG            | Phone:    +49 89 - 722 40065
ICM N PG U ID A1      | Fax:      +49 89 - 722 58726
Hofmannstr. 51        | Visitors: Building 1713 / Room 714
D - 81359 München     | Email:    [email-masked]

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip