Subject: [Sip] draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-01.txt

From: Henning Schulzrinne <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 22:52:01 -0400

Thanks for the comments. Leaving out the editorial issues that we'll be 
addressing in the post-WGLC phase, one question/comment:

> 7. Why the values are taken as "NameSpace.<Priority>" , We can have NV
>    pairs, with comma separated values and semicolon between different
>    namespaces, Just for better brevity/expression ratio. Not much
>    inclined to any choices. 

I'm not exactly sure what you had in mind here. Something like

namespace;priority,namespace;priority

?

If so, this would not conform to the standard conventions for SIP 
headers. Could you please explain?

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip