Subject: RE: [Sip] Connected Destination in SIP

From: "Dolly, Martin C, ALABS" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 07:00:00 -0500

Understand, but...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Willis [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 2:50 AM
> To: Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
> Cc: Chris Whitaker; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [Sip] Connected Destination in SIP
> 
> 
> Dolly, Martin C, ALABS wrote:
> > this is simple, relay the ID of the connected party 
> backward....this is
> > all in a semi-trusted  domain...we are not talking about the "OPEN"
> > internet. If the IETF can not address this need...(reality check...
> > vendors...services providers need this....so chill paul)
> 
> Sorry, Martin! This IS the IETF. We ARE talking about the 
> open Internet 
> (that's the I in IETF, right? They didn't change the acronym to 
> "Interiornet" or something when I wasn't looking?).
> In general, it's not in our charter to really consider 
> something else -- 
> and when we do have to write up something that works in only a small, 
> walled corner of the net, it carries severe "applicability statement" 
> warnings.
> 
> You want to talk a lot about approaches that only work in a walled 
> garden, you need the ITU. ;-).
> 
> --
> Dean
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip