Subject: RE: [Sip] draft-cao-sip-response-identity-00.txt

From: "Elwell, John" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:10:39 +0100

Suits me

John 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Willis [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: 29 March 2006 19:05
> To: Francois Audet
> Cc: [email-masked] List
> Subject: Re: [Sip] draft-cao-sip-response-identity-00.txt
> 
> 
> On Mar 29, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Francois Audet wrote:
> 
> > My take is that there is no agreement that there is a compelling  
> > reason
> > to do response identity. That's the main issue.
> >
> > I agree that connected-identity on the other is non-controversial.
> 
> I propose that we amend the charter to show a midsummer deliverable  
> for connected identity, and use the Elwell draft as a basis for this  
> deliverable.
> 
> Then we add a later milestone to deliver a decision on whether we  
> will be adding a new milestone for response identity.
> 
> How does that sound?
> 
> --
> Dean
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
> Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip
> 

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip