Subject: RE: [Sip] draft-elwell-sip-connected-identity-01.txt

From: "Drage, Keith (Keith)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 18:31:48 +0100

The current decision is to see if http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-elwell-sip-connected-identity-01.txt forms the basis of progressing as a WG item to fulfil our charter item.

As such, it is still discussable and reviewable, but contents have to abide by WG decision, rather than author preference.

The face-to-face meeting said it was, and we are looking to confirm that decision using the list.

Does your comment indicate merely something missing that can be added, or does it indicate that the document is entirely in the wrong direction and therefore you object to the face-to-face meeting decision.

regards

Keith

P.S. Reminder to all posters. Particularly when replying to specific questions we have asked, it helps if what you post actually constitutes an answer to the question. Mind reading does not yet constitute a qualification for a WG chair - we are still waiting for the relevant RFC to reach standards track before implementing.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF) 
> [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: 31 March 2006 13:08
> To: Drage, Keith (Keith); [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: [Sip] draft-elwell-sip-connected-identity-01.txt
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Keith,
> 
> I sent a mail within the "comments on sip-connected-identity" 
> thread. I
> presented some issues with the current solution, but also pointed out
> that the draft currently does not talk about proxy impacts.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drage, Keith (Keith) [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: 26. maaliskuuta 2006 19:25
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Sip] draft-elwell-sip-connected-identity-01.txt
> 
> (As chair)
> 
> At the face-to-face meeting at IETF 65 we agreed that
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-elwell-sip-connected
-identity-
01.txt formed the basis of part of our charter milestone to provide
"Mechanism for Response Identity to IESG (PS).

This mail is to confirm that decision using the list. If you have issues
with this decision, please respond to this mail.

Note: Please keep responses to this thread entirely separate to the
thread on draft-cao-sip-response-identity

regards

Keith

Keith Drage
[email-masked]

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use
[email-masked] for questions on current sip Use
[email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments on the application of sip