Subject: RE: [Sipping] Need review fordraft-ranarang-sipping-middialog-sip-status-00.txt

From: "Drage, Keith \(Keith\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:23:41 +0200

I don't know what sort of review you were expecting, but please note.

The SIPPING WG needs to deal with the underlying requirements that cause
such a signalling indication to be needed. 

Once that occurs, a draft proposing a new response code will have to be
a new SIP WG item.

Regards

Keith

________________________________

	From: Rajeev Narang (ranarang) [mailto:[email-masked]] 
	Sent: 25 September 2006 06:29
	To: [email-masked]
	Subject: [Sipping] Need review
fordraft-ranarang-sipping-middialog-sip-status-00.txt

	Hi,
	 
	I posted a draft for review:-
	
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ranarang-sipping-middialog-sip
-status-00.txt
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ranarang-sipping-middialog-si
p-status-00.txt> 
	 
	Could somebody review and provide comments on this.
	 
	Thanks much,
	Rajeev

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments of core SIP