Subject: [Speermint] Some brief comments about the architecture draft

From: "David Schwartz" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:42:59 -0000

In general, I find confusing use of the term "target" (e.g. in 5.1.1.2 "if an external E.164 address is the target...")

Also many contradictions, in one place we say that LRF finds the target SF and in another we say the LRF finds the next hop SF.

Page 6 grammer: for call to be establish 
Page 8: 5.1.1 Lookup Function doesn't find the target SF
5.1.1.1. No mention of LUF - probably needed in the case of e.164 numbers

No mention of private registries. Also, the order of query should not be dictated.

Many assumptions are made about ENUM as the LUF and LRF mechanism assuming 3263 model

publishing SIP DNS records (5.2.1.2) should be out of scope for speermint

D.

_______________________________________________
Speermint mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint