Subject: Re: [Speermint] Updating draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-use-02

From: "Livingood, Jason" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:43:09 -0500

Good idea, Benny.  If you or anyone else could propose some text, that'd
be great.

Jason 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] 
> [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Rodrig, Benny (Benny)
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 6:11 PM
> To: Livingood, Jason; [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [Speermint] Updating 
> draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-use-02
> 
> Jason,
> 
> You may want to add some more description of how this works 
> in the indirect/transit case. The draft states that it is the 
> same as the direct case, but the details and the assumptions 
> may not be obvious.
> 
> Thanks,
> Benny 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] 
> [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Livingood, Jason
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 4:03 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Speermint] Updating draft-ietf-speermint-srv-naptr-use-02
> 
> I am planning to work on an update of this I-D soon.  Anyone 
> have any glaring issues that need to be fixed in or addressed 
> by the draft that they wish to point out?
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-speermint-srv-n
> aptr-use-0
> 2.txt
> 
> Thanks
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> Speermint mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint
> _______________________________________________
> Speermint mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint
> 
_______________________________________________
Speermint mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint