Subject: RE: comments on requirements draft 04

From: "Hattig, Myron" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 09:38:41 -0700

> I therefore argue that we ***not*** require this (even as a 
> SHOULD, which
> means 'do it unless there is a good reason not to'.)  Someone 
> MAY support 
> this feature - but in this case, it has no place in a 
> requirements document.

You convinced me that the requirement should be removed.

-myron