Subject: [teas-3272bis-design-team] Design Team Charter - for the record

From: "Adrian Farrel" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:30:06 -0000

Here is the charter of this Design Team as sent to the TEAS list by the WG chairs on 1/25/19

Just putting it here so it is in the mailing list archive.

Adrian

From: Teas <[email-masked]> On Behalf Of Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Sent: 25 January 2019 16:03
To: TEAS WG <[email-masked]>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <[email-masked]>
Subject: [Teas] RFC3272bis -- Design Team

WG,

We have formed the TEAS 3272bis Design Team.  The objectives and membership of the design team are listed below.  We’d like to thank all those who volunteered to join the team, and recognize Adrian Farrel who has agreed to serve as Team Lead.  Not all who volunteered were included in the team - and we’d like to especially thank these individuals.  All will be able to participate in this work once we have a WG document on the topic and, as always, the document progresses through normal WG processing.  We do note that the objective of the DT is to produce a draft 3272bis and there is no requirement for the authorship to be limited to or include all DT members, and as usual, we expect a WG document to reflect actual contribution to the work.

The DT is expected to work on its own using whatever methods best suit its members. The DT will use an IETF mailing list that will include the team members listed below plus the WG chairs, and will be archived and openly readable. 
--
TEAS 3272bis Design Team

Over the many years since RFC 3272 was published, the use of Traffic Engineering (TE) technologies and concepts within the Internet has become commonplace, and the mechanisms have developed and broadened. Recent discussion of the term "TE" in a number of Working Groups (chiefly in the Routing Area) has indicated that RFC 3272 is somewhat out-of-date as a base reference.

This Design Team’s objective to update RFC 3272 by making a full revision (draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis) that strengthens existing definitions, introduces new definitions where needed, brings the work up-to-date with current best practices, and includes (via appropriate references) the latest and on-going work in the IETF.

The DT will provide regular updates and reports to the TEAS working group.  It will present an update on their status and plans at IETF 104 (Prague) and an initial DT draft in time for discussion at IETF 105 (Montreal). Once the draft is accepted as a working group document, it will progress per TEAS working group normal process.

The DT mailing list is being set up, and will be: [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> 

 The team members are: 
    Acee Lindem <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >
    Adrian Farrel <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> > (Team Lead)
    Aijun Wang <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >
    Daniele Ceccarelli <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >
    Dieter Beller <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >
    Jeff Tantsura <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >
    Julien Meuric <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >
    Liu Hua <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >
    Loa Andersson <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >
    Luis Miguel Contreras <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >
    Martin Horneffer <Martin.Horneffer@telekom..de <mailto:[email-masked]> >
    Tarek Saad <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >
    Xufeng Liu <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >

--
Thank you,
Pavan and Lou