Subject: [TLS] Review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-01

From: Eric Rescorla <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:35:44 -0800

$Id: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-01-rev.txt,v 1.1 2008/03/04 18:15:11 ekr Exp $

This draft seems to mostly OK, but I think it still
needs some changes.

- The hash in client_certificate_url needs to be mandatory.
  IIRC, that was WG consensus when this was discussed.

- In S 4, I wonder if too long packets MUST be rejected
  rather than may.

-Ekr

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls