Subject: [TLS] Posting of IPR disclosure (#1153)

From: <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:54:19 +0200

FYI, this was posted yesterday:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1153/

Best regards,
Pasi

---

From: Matthew Campagna <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:26:09 -0400

Pasi,

   Thank you.  I am looking to get the form-mangled I-D names returned to the submitted names:

draft?rescorla?tls?suiteb?12, draft?green?secsh?ecc?07, draft?igoe?secsh?suiteb?00, draft?ietf?smime?3278bis?07, draft?ietf?smime?sha2?11

restored to

draft-rescorla-tls-suiteb-12, draft-green-secsh-ecc-07, draft-igoe-secsh-suiteb-00, draft-ietf-smime-3278bis-07, draft-ietf-smime-sha2-11

Regards,
   Matt

Matthew Campagna
Certicom Research
Office: 203.894.9777 Main: 905.507.4220 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
> [email-masked]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:54 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [TLS] Posting of IPR disclosure (#1153)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

---

From: Dean Anderson <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:56:46 -0400 (EDT)

I don't see any difference between this disclosure and IPR 1004.

Same 19 RFCs 
Same 11 drafts 
Same linked document
Same contact information.

Is there an error here?

		--Dean

-- 
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000