Subject: callus

From: "Christie K. Stinson" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:51:38 +0900

Yep, that's right -  Javascript.
To do the really slick stuff, you need more.
The various UI glitz behaviors like drag drop, floating, hover, popups, and opacity - not in Core.
Virtually all of the controls, extenders, and behaviors - not in Core. Error: The connection to the server is unavailable.
NET to redirect the WebResource requests to our customized versions of the scripts. I wanted to send a suggestion or two to the WLW team, so I clicked the Send Feedback menu item.
Java, JavaServer Faces, and all           Java-based marks are trademarks or registered trademarks of    Sun Microsystems, Inc.
First off, I agree with him on many of the points he raised.
Newsgroups, MSDN forums, ASP. I suspect that they will soon enough. Written by experts directly involved in JSF development, this book covers everything JSF, from using Hibernate to integ.
Certainly not Firefox, Word, Excel, Visual Studio, or any other app I use. If were to summarize the contents in a single phrase, it would be this - server-side AJAX wins, client-side AJAX loses. Sample code and detailed explanations are also covered.
First off, I agree with him on many of the points he raised.
But, I think some of Ignacio's major complaints can be easily re. I wanted to send a suggestion or two to the WLW team, so I clicked the Send Feedback menu item. I saw this coming a coup. is independent of    Sun Microsystems, Inc.
First off, I agree with him on many of the points he raised. Sample code and detailed explanations are also cov.
I don't know about you, but that leaves me a bit uncomfortable. Regular CTP drops were being released, the open source-y goodness of the Atlas Control Toolkit was announced, and things seemed to be moving along well. One is that the Atlas framework is ungoing a major refactoring. Most of the super-cool client-side script capabilities in the previous CTPs are in the Value-Add component, not the Core.
It's a fantastic blogging tool.
well, that would be a major bummer.
But, given Microsoft's fanatical approach to backward compatibility, I want it to go out as fully baked as possible. I discovered this for myself recently while playing with the beta, and frankly was stunned.
So what happens when you encounter one of those bugs? NET apps into the world of AJAX, while leverage a lot of the existing ASP. I don't know about you, but that leaves me a bit uncomfortable. I'm fairly certain the folks at Netscape had had way too much coffee when they . For people hoping to do much with MSAjax without using ASP.