Subject: Re: [Trans] [trans] #139 (rfc6962-bis): move text re: domain labels to CA specification

From: "trans issue tracker" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:39:41 -0000

#139: move text re: domain labels to CA specification

Changes (by [email-masked]):

 * milestone:   => review

Comment:

 I don't believe the WG has agreed this doc should focus on log operation.

 Suggest resolve as wontfix.

-- 
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:               |       Owner:  draft-ietf-trans-
  [email-masked]           |  [email-masked]
     Type:  defect       |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major        |   Milestone:  review
Component:  rfc6962-bis  |     Version:
 Severity:  -            |  Resolution:
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/139#comment:1>
trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/>

---

From: "trans issue tracker" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:52:47 -0000

Changes (by [email-masked]):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => wontfix

-- 
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:               |       Owner:  draft-ietf-trans-
  [email-masked]           |  [email-masked]
     Type:  defect       |      Status:  closed
 Priority:  major        |   Milestone:  review
Component:  rfc6962-bis  |     Version:
 Severity:  -            |  Resolution:  wontfix
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/139#comment:2>
trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/>

---

From: Stephen Kent <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:38:06 -0500

Ben

>   Suggest resolve as wontfix.
I don't believe that any significant fraction of the WG has expressed an
opinion about this matter on the list, despite requests from Melinda.

Steve