Subject: [rbridge] Comments on: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/dr aft-ietf-trill-rbridge-arch-01.txt

From: Eric.Gray at marconi.com (Gray, Eric)
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:48:04 -0500

Russ,

	I will add the "demux text" to the definition of Node... 

--
Eric

--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: Russ White [mailto:riw at cisco.com] 
--> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 11:23 AM
--> To: Gray, Eric
--> Cc: Silvano Gai; rbridge at postel.org
--> Subject: Re: [rbridge] Comments on: 
--> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/dr 
--> aft-ietf-trill-rbridge-arch-01.txt
--> 
--> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
--> Hash: SHA1
--> 
--> 
--> 
--> > However, we in the IETF are more familiar with the term "node." 
--> > 
--> > This is hardly a significant issue.  if people agree that 
--> we should
--> > use the term "station" as opposed to "node", then I will 
--> change it.
--> 
--> I prefer node, since that's the common IETF wording, and 
--> one that people
--> will understand. It also relates to graph theory better 
--> than "station"
--> does. It might be useful to note this relationship in the 
--> definitions
--> someplace or another, but I don't see a reason to change 
--> the entire doc
--> around.
--> 
--> :-)
--> 
--> Russ
--> 
--> - --
--> riw at cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone
--> 
--> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
--> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
--> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
--> 
--> iD8DBQFFSMnJER27sUhU9OQRAmEsAKDexb89IG4s4VVEdYcZ6v+mEhlcZACfUYDT
--> cw3YUKtBBTa3FI0BTaVM18o=
--> =AghD
--> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-->