Subject: [trill] Re. draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd

From: "MALLIK MUDIGONDA (mmudigon)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 06:10:15 +0000

Hi,

I support this draft and think it is ready for standardization.

Regards
Mallik
------------------------------------------
From: "Susan Hares" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
To: <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:53:04 -0500
Message-ID: <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01A0_01D28138.BDA69B90"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdKBYcaNCIttSHamSIWQlu+T7bZSDw==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trill/54KtM2G6PXjIttN8nEGyMDHMOgM>
Cc: 'Donald Eastlake' <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, 'Jon Hudson' <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016
X-BeenThere: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:[email-masked]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trill/>
List-Post: <mailto:[email-masked]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email-masked]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:[email-masked]?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:57:33 -0000

This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd.  The draft can be
obtained at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-p2mp-bfd/

In your comments please consider,

1)      Does the support of multi-point BFD aid deployments?

2)      Are the suggested additions to RFC7177 bootstrapping sufficient for
this technology?

3)      Do you feel this technology is ready for standardization?

Sue Hares

Trill Co-chair