Subject: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016 - Second WG LC (3/7 to 3/20)

From: Santosh P K <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:23:46 +0530

>We did not receive any comments on the WGLC for draft->ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt
>(https://www.ietf.org/mail->archive/web/trill/current/msg07692.html <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg07692.html>).
>Perhaps this was because I started the WG LC during >Chinese new year.   We
>will try a second WG LC before declaring "no support for >this draft"

>In your comments please consider,

>1)      Does the support of multi-point BFD aid >deployments?

>2)      Are the suggested additions to RFC7177 >bootstrapping sufficient for
>this technology?

>3)      Do you feel this technology is ready for >standardization?

I do support this draft and think it is good for standardisation.

Thanks
Santosh P K