Subject: RE: [Tsvwg] Re: comments on draft-baker-mlef-concerns-00.txt (3) MLEF Thresholds

From: Fred Baker <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:42:50 -0200

At 03:45 PM 12/10/2003, Steve Silverman wrote:
>At the packet level, the MLEF PHB does not know
>about calls, it just sees packets at each DSCP level.

ok, so that brings us back to the fundamental concern, that it is designed 
for use in environments where congestive loss is normal, unlike EF, which 
is designed for an environment where bandwidth available exceeds offered 
load in anything resembling a normal circumstance.

Nobody has yet responded to the math, or the fundamental system effects. 
All I have heard is handwaving about how it couldn't be that bad, because 
EF seems to work, but ignoring the fundamental reason why the military is 
concerned about call preemption. 

_______________________________________________
tsvwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg