Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] Draft tsvwg meeting minutes

From: "MORITA, Naotaka" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:01:09 +0900

Allison and Jon,

Could you add other two drafts included in my presentation?

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-morita-tsvwg-mfphb-00.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-morita-tsvwg-mfverify-00.txt

Naotaka

At 14:10 03/12/18 -0800, Allison Mankin wrote:
 >
 >TSVWG folks,
 >
 >Gorry Fairhurst took very good minutes from the IETF 58, and here
 >they are after a few Chair edits for a quick review before the IETF
 >proceedings CD-ROM deadline tomorrow (updates can happen after that,
 >just not for the disk).
 >
 >Everyone who did not send viewgraphs, please do now!  thanks!
 >
 >Allison and Jon
 >
 >IETF 58 - Monday, November 10 at 0900-1130
 >==========================================

 >------------------------
 >Priority Promotion Scheme (Naotaka MORITA)
 >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-morita-tsvwg-pps-01.txt
 >
 >Q: How is feedback provided on packet drops?
 >Ans: In the work we use RTCP feedback (based on packet loss).
 >Q: Looking at Security: how do you prevent a sender from just using a high
 >priority?
 >Ans: We use two boxes that monitor the correct behaviour of senders, and
 >take action.
 >
 >JP: Can we take a hum on whether there is general interest in doing this in
 >tsvwg.
 ><hum>
 >JP: There seems to be rough consensus on doing this in tsvwg.
 >
 >------------------------

----------------------------------
Naotaka MORITA, NTT 

_______________________________________________
tsvwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg