Subject: Question on SCTP IG was Re: [Tsvwg] Kwok's Minutes for TSVWG sessions at 64th IETF in Vancouver

From: Allison Mankin <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:58:25 -0800

Kwok's minutes should be called notes, they aren't yet reviewed
and corrected, though we thank him very much for them.

Take a look at:
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05nov/slides/tsvwg-10.pdf

The Old Milestones slide shows the SCTP IG as an Info and the 
New ones show it as a PS.  We agreed during WG discussion
at IETF 62 that the IG would be a PS because it was
modifying a PS.  We confirmed this on the mailing list.

Allison

> 
> Kwok-Ho,
> 
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Kwok-Ho Chan wrote:
> 
> --X-snip-X--
> > 
> > SCTP Milestones (reflects date changes discussed during the meeting)
> > ---------------
> > - I-G - Dec 05 (Informational)
> > - Add-IP and Auth - Feb 06 (PS)
> > - 2960BIS - Apr 06 (PS)
> > - Threats - Feb 06 (Info)
> > - API - June 06 (Info)
> > 
> --X-snip-X--
> 
> It this correct?
> 
> The minutes say that the SCTP I-G is slated for Dec 05 as Informational.
> 
> James tells me that it was decided in the meeting that it be PS.
> 
> Which is it?
> 
> --brian
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
tsvwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg