Subject: Re: [tsvwg] New Liaison Statement, "In response to: Development of Informative Codepoint mapping in ITU-T Study Group 12"

From: "MORTON JR., ALFRED (AL)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:24:55 -0500

Thanks David, adding the SG 12 Secretariat Contact address,
so this reply can be posted in our document system.

regards,
Al
(as Acting Rapporteur, Question17/12:
Rapporteur assignments for the 2013-2016 
Study Period are unofficial until
assigned at the opening plenary.)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liaison Statement Management Tool [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 9:19 AM
> To: MORTON JR., ALFRED (AL)
> Cc: Gorry Fairhurst; James Polk; Wesley Eddy; Martin Stiemerling; Eliot
> Lear; Transport Area Working Group Discussion List; David Black; David
> Black
> Subject: New Liaison Statement, "In response to: Development of
> Informative Codepoint mapping in ITU-T Study Group 12"
> 
> Title: In response to: Development of Informative Codepoint mapping in
> ITU-T Study Group 12
> Submission Date: 2013-02-28
> URL of the IETF Web page: http://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1241/
> 
> From: Transport Area Working Group (David Black <David Black
> <[email-masked]>>)
> To: ITU-T SG 12 (A. C. Morton <[email-masked]>)
> Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <[email-masked]>,James Polk
> <[email-masked]>,Wesley Eddy <[email-masked]>,Martin Stiemerling
> <[email-masked]>,Eliot Lear <[email-masked]>,Transport Area
> Working Group Discussion List <[email-masked]>
> Reponse Contact: David Black <[email-masked]>
> Technical Contact: David Black <[email-masked]>
> Purpose: In response
> Referenced liaison: Development of Informative Codepoint mapping in ITU-T
> Study Group 12 (http://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1165/)
> Body: The Transport Area Working Group thanks ITU-T's study group 12 for
> its liaison of 3 July 2012.  We note with appreciation the active
> involvement of Mssrs. Geib and Morton.
> 
> Since its receipt we have had several very engaging discussions, both in
> person, and on our mailing list that have considered the appendices to
> Y.QoSmap (now Y.1566).  The WG has concluded that we will take on inter-
> provider QoS as a work item. This is a first step.  The WG anticipates
> contributions along these lines to consider.  We will keep you apprised of
> work in this area.
> Attachments:
> 
> No document has been attached