Subject: [tsvwg] REMINDER: TSVWG WGLC: draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap-11

From: "Black, David" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:44:17 +0000

This is a reminder that WG Last Call is in progress on this draft.

Please take a look at this draft, as there have been significant text changes
since the Yokohama meetings.  We need to know that people have reviewed
the draft, so even if you've found nothing to comment on, please send a
message to the list to say that you've read the latest version of the draft
and support its publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.

Thanks, --David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tsvwg [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Black, David
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 11:04 AM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [tsvwg] TSVWG WGLC: draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap-11
> Importance: High
> 
> This email announces a TSVWG Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on:
> 
>                          GRE-in-UDP Encapsulation
>                    draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap-11
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap/
> 
> Due to the upcoming Buenos Aires meetings, this WGLC will last for about 3
> weeks, ending at midnight US Eastern (daylight) Time on Saturday, April 2.
> 
> Comments should be sent to the [email-masked] list, although purely
> editorial comments may be sent directly to the authors at
> [email-masked].  Please cc: the WG chairs at
> [email-masked] if you would like the chairs to track such editorial
> comments as part of the WGLC process.
> 
> This draft has been extensively revised since the Yokohama meeting week,
> including some important terminology changes to better align with the
> rfc5405bis draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis/).
> 
> The chairs encourage reviewers to pay particular attention to the draft's
> discussion of applicability to two environments (begins in Section 2) - the
> two environments are the general Internet usage (Default) and traffic-managed
> controlled environments (TMCE).  When published as an RFC, this document
> is likely to serve as an example of how to specify dual-environment-applicability
> for other drafts.
> 
> Thanks, --David
> ----------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer
> EMC, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> +1 (508) 293-7953     Cell: +1 (978) 394-7754
> [email-masked]
> ----------------------------------------------------