Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Int-area] 2nd TSVWG WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts, closes 6 May 2019

From: Joe Touch <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 10:13:51 -0700

Cross-posting to let both communities know:

- it would be useful for these documents to address how fragmentation and reassembly affects these signals
	(esp. if reassembling fragments with different ECN values)

- it would be useful for these documents to consider draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels (which relates to the above) and its discussion on many of the protocols cited

Joe

> On Apr 26, 2019, at 1:50 PM, Black, David <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> This may be of interest to INT folks who are interested in tunnels and encapsulations.
>  
> Comments by the WGLC deadline are encouraged, but comments after the deadline are ok, as they’d have to be dealt with anyway at IETF Last Call.
>  
> Thanks, --David
>  
> From: tsvwg <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>> On Behalf Of Black, David
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:51 PM
> To: [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>
> Subject: [tsvwg] 2nd WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts, closes 6 May 2019
>  
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL] 
> 
> This email announces a 2nd TSVWG Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on two drafts:
>  
> [1] Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that
>                              Encapsulate IP
>                 draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-12
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines/>
> This draft is intended to become a Best Current Practice RFC
>  
> [2] Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification Across IP Tunnel Headers
>                           Separated by a Shim
>                  draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim-08
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim/>
> This draft is intended to become a Proposed Standard RFC.
>  
> This WGLC will run through the end of the day on Monday, May 6, 2019.
>  
> Comments should be sent to the [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> list, although purely
> editorial comments may be sent directly to the author. Please cc: the
> WG chairs at [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>  if you would like the chairs to
> track such editorial comments as part of the WGLC process.
>  
> No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on either draft
>  
> Thanks,
> David, Gorry and Wes
> (TSVWG Co-Chairs)
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>