Subject: [Uri-review] Request review for URI schemes for CoAP over reliable transports

From: Carsten Bormann <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 07:32:07 +0200

It seems we never formally requested a review of the four new URI schemes for CoAP over TCP, TLS, and WebSockets, as requested in

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls-07#section-10.5

To summarize these four schemes:

     coap-tcp-URI = "coap+tcp:" "//" host [ ":" port ]
       path-abempty [ "?" query ]  [ "#" fragment ]

     coaps-tcp-URI = "coaps+tcp:" "//" host [ ":" port ]
       path-abempty [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

     coap-ws-URI = "coap+ws:" "//" host [ ":" port ]
       path-abempty [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

     coaps-ws-URI = "coaps+ws:" "//" host [ ":" port ]
       path-abempty [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]

For the details, please see the draft, which has completed IETF last call.
(These are patterned after “coap:” and “coaps:” in RFC 7252, which are defined over UDP and DTLS, respectively.)

Grüße, Carsten