Subject: [urn] 2141bis questions - (10) Backward compatibility

From: John C Klensin <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 02:01:54 -0500

The registration procedures for formal and informal namespaces
(Sections 8.1 and 8.2) both provide for revisions of the
registration by updating the template.   Especially given some
discussions in the WG, I think we should impose an explicit
requirement for a description of differences from prior versions
and/or backward compatibility in updated registrations.

Do others agree?

   john