Subject: Re: [v4tov6transition] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lee-v4v6tran-problem-00]

From: Tina TSOU <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:54:55 +0800

B. R.
Tina
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/index.html
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Randy Bush" <[email-masked]>
To: "Rémi Després" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Brian E Carpenter" <[email-masked]>; "IPv6 Operations" 
<[email-masked]>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: New Version Notification for 
draft-lee-v4v6tran-problem-00]

>> A unique and more general question could IMHO convey this view, e.g.:
>> "Are there recommended prefix lengths for operators, in view of with
>> sizes, and if yes which ones?"
>
> hell no.  put that in an rfc, and it will be thrown in operator's faces
> on a daily basis.
>
> maybe "trade-offs in prefix length choices for varying uses."
Good points for both of you.
> randy