Subject: V6ops: IPv6 site multihoming best practices

From: "Dwight Jamieson" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:47:37 -0500

In the absence of mature protocol support for site multi-homing (shim6),
what are the best practice recommendations for an enterprise or service
provider?

Cheers,
Dwight

---

From: "James Jun" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:03:51 -0500

_____  

From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf
Of Dwight Jamieson
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:48 PM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: V6ops: IPv6 site multihoming best practices

Cheers, 
Dwight

---

From: "James Jun" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:18:03 -0500

Ugh, sorry guys, for the blank email.  This was a mistake.

Regards,

James Jun

IP Infrastructure & Technology Services

TowardEX Technologies, Inc.

WWW: http://www.towardex.com

Email: [email-masked]

Office: +1 (617) 459-4051 Ext. 179

Mobile: +1 (978) 394-2867

  _____  

From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf
Of James Jun
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 3:04 PM
To: 'Dwight Jamieson'; [email-masked]
Subject: RE: V6ops: IPv6 site multihoming best practices

  _____  

 

Cheers, 
Dwight

---

From: Mohacsi Janos <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:00:13 +0100 (CET)

Hi,
 	I do prefer working solutions that exist for site multihoming:
e.g RFC 3178. I also cover several alternatives in my IPv6 Multihoming 
presentation: http://www.6diss.org/workshops/saf/multihoming.pdf

Regards,

Janos Mohacsi
Network Engineer, Research Associate
NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
Key 00F9AF98: 8645 1312 D249 471B DBAE  21A2 9F52 0D1F 00F9 AF98