Subject: RE: [BEHAVE] RE: Firewall control

From: "Hesham Soliman" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 01:57:40 +1000

> > Another one would be: "Why do the IPv4 solutions don't 
 > work given that they
 > > are designed with extensibility in mind?"
 > 
 > Actually, they don't really work all that well (UPnP IGD, 
 > NAT-PMP, STUN 
 > control). These "pragmatic" solutions to IPv4 firewall 
 > control are heavily 
 > biased toward NAT traversal.

=> That's exactly right. A lot of this is inherited from the FW == NAT
world. 

Hesham

 > 
 > -- 
 > Rémi Denis-Courmont
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > Behave mailing list
 > [email-masked]
 > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
 >