Subject: FW: (Microsoft Windows DHCP Team Blog) : Use of extended length prefixes

From: "Dunn, Jeffrey H." <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 07:42:20 -0400

Colleagues,

Many thanks to Ralph Droms for verifying that Cisco does support
extended prefixes.  As you can see from the forwarded e-mail below,
Microsoft does not ;-(

Best Regards,
 
Jeffrey Dunn
Info Systems Eng., Lead
MITRE Corporation.

-----Original Message-----
From: Manu Jeewani [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 2:13 AM
To: Dunn, Jeffrey H.; DHCP Bloggers
Subject: RE: (Microsoft Windows DHCP Team Blog) : Use of extended
length prefixes

Hi Jeff,

Windows server 2008 DHCP server does not support prefix other then 64
bit.

Thanks,
Manu

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: 05 June 2008 23:15
To: DHCP Bloggers
Subject: (Microsoft Windows DHCP Team Blog) : Use of extended length
prefixes
Importance: High

Greetings,

I am interested in associating extended length (longer than 64 bit)
prefixes with links or link addrresses.  Will the WIN SVR 2008 DHCPv6
server support prefixes longer than 64 bits?

Regards,

Jeff
----------------------------------
This message was generated from a contact form at:
http://blogs.technet.com/teamdhcp/default.aspx
It was submitted by Jeffrey Dunn ([email-masked])

Your contact information was not shared with the user.

---

From: Niall O'Reilly <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:01:55 +0100

On 6 Jun 2008, at 12:42, Dunn, Jeffrey H. wrote:

> extended prefixes.

	YMMV.  Not all Cisco kit supports extended prefixes equally.

	Best regards,

	Niall O'Reilly
	University College Dublin IT Services

	PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net)
	Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9