Subject: [v6ops] Fwd: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-16

From: Fred Baker <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 17:19:04 -0700

Following up from IETF 104, the draft-ietf-opsec-v6 authors have updated their draft and are preparing for working group last call in opsec. It will be on the v6ops agenda for IETF 105, and if there are any additional comments the authors would like to have them, please. 

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Enno Rey <[email-masked]>
> Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-opsec-v6-16
> Date: March 28, 2019 at 2:36:00 PM PDT
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> as briefly announced by Fred at the end of the session we, the authors of draft-ietf-opsec-v6 ("Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 Networks"), would like to ask the group for review and feedback on the document (to enter WGLC in opsec). The initial idea behind the doc was to provide security-oriented input on v6 networks (to operations) as we felt that there was quite some interest in such input coming from the IETF (similar to e.g. RFC 7381). It has already undergone several revisions, striving - as we think - for a reasonable balance of discussing options while at the same time providing some guidance.
> We would be very happy about any additional critical feedback or suggestions from your side. Thank you in advance for your efforts!
> 
> best
> 
> Enno
> 
> -- 
> Enno Rey
> 
> ERNW GmbH - Carl-Bosch-Str. 4 - 69115 Heidelberg - www.ernw.de
> Tel. +49 6221 480390 - Fax 6221 419008 - Cell +49 173 6745902 
> 
> Handelsregister Mannheim: HRB 337135
> Geschaeftsfuehrer: Florian Grunow, Enno Rey
> 
> =======================================================
> Blog: www.insinuator.net || Conference: www.troopers.de
> Twitter: @Enno_Insinuator
> =======================================================
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that there is a highway to hell and a stairway to heaven is an interesting comment on projected traffic volume...